Will another state ban or pause police use of Flock cameras?: Will it be reported by a Source Agency that a U.S. state other than Texas, Florida or Rhode Island has banned, suspended or paused law enforcement use of Flock Safety or other automated license plate reader cameras before Jan 1, 2027?
Price checked at
Probability history
Market-implied probabilities · All recorded historyDrag to move · pinch or ⌘/Ctrl+scroll to zoom
Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.
Based on this market’s outcome prices, expressed as probabilities.
Resolution rules
If a U.S. state other than Texas, Florida or Rhode Island has banned, suspended or paused law enforcement use of Flock Safety or other automated license plate reader cameras after Issuance and before Jan 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes. A qualifying action is enacted legislation, an executive order, a court order applying statewide, or a binding directive from a state official or agency with statewide authority, that prohibits, suspends or pauses the installation or operation of Flock Safety or other automated license plate reader cameras by law enforcement. Any action by Texas, Florida or Rhode Island does not count, including further or expanded action by those states. The following count: A statewide ban or moratorium on new law enforcement ALPR installations A statewide order pausing or suspending operation of cameras already installed A ban or pause that covers only state roads or other state-owned property, or only state agencies A binding directive from a state official with statewide authority, even where it reaches state agencies such as the state police in the first instance A measure with a delayed effective date, so long as the action itself is taken before the market's date The following do NOT count: Action by a city, county, school district or any other political subdivision rather than the state Conditions on use rather than a prohibition, suspension or pause, including purpose limits, data retention limits, warrant requirements, audit requirements and restrictions on data sharing A freeze or cut in state funding that does not itself prohibit or pause installation or operation of the cameras A non-binding request, recommendation or urging that a locality is free to disregard A review, study or task force that has not itself imposed a ban, suspension or pause A law enforcement agency's own decision to stop using cameras where the state has not required it Anything that happened before Issuance Only reporting from a Source Agency qualifies for the purposes of this market. Reports that merely reference prior publications (from before Issuance) do not qualify. Republishing of content originally produced by other sources (e.g., wire services) only qualifies if the content is hosted on the outlet's official platform and the outlet is clearly identified as the publishing entity.
Other legs of this event
A leg read alone is misleading; the others are beside it.Venue activity
Read from the venue this minuteDiscussion on Predxy
What Predxy's readers make of this market. Everyone can read; signed-in readers can write. The venue's own thread, when it has one, is the box below.Sign in to join the discussion.
Nobody has said anything here yet.
As of Nov 1, 02:22 PM UTC