KalshiOpen

Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Mike Gesicki: 60+ receiving yards

No86%
Mike Gesicki: 60+14%

Price checked at

Trade
Set your country to see where you can trade.Set your country →
Opens the venue in a new tab, through Predxy.
24h volume$0
7d volume—
30d volume—
Liquidity—
Spread7%
ResolvesOct 4, 2026in 3 days

Probability history

Drag to move · pinch or ⌘/Ctrl+scroll to zoom

Probability history0%25%50%75%100%Oct 1, 05:15 AMOct 1, 11:06 AMOct 1, 04:58 PMOct 1, 10:49 PM

No recorded data before Oct 1 in this window.

Based on this market’s outcome prices, expressed as probabilities.

Resolution rules

If Mike Gesicki records 60+ receiving yards in the Jacksonville vs Cincinnati Pro Football game originally scheduled for Oct 4, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. The following market refers to Mike Gesicki in the Jacksonville vs Cincinnati Pro Football game originally scheduled for Oct 4, 2026. If Mike Gesicki is active but never takes a snap, the market settles to the fair market price before game start. Once Mike Gesicki takes at least one snap, even if nullified by penalty, the market settles based on receiving yards recorded. Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.

Other legs of this event

MarketVenuePriceStatus
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Ja'Marr Chase: 80+ receiving yardsKalshi54% Ja'Marr Chase: 80+Open
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Dohnte Meyers: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi57% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Brenton Strange: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi57% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Tee Higgins: 60+ receiving yardsKalshi53% Tee Higgins: 60+Open
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Ja'Marr Chase: 100+ receiving yardsKalshi65% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Ja'Marr Chase: 110+ receiving yardsKalshi73% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Tee Higgins: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi72% Tee Higgins: 40+Open
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Parker Washington: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi82% Parker Washington: 40+Open
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Ja'Marr Chase: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi79% Ja'Marr Chase: 50+Open
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Chase Brown: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi82% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Ja'Marr Chase: 120+ receiving yardsKalshi77% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Parker Washington: 70+ receiving yardsKalshi55% Parker Washington: 70+Open
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Parker Washington: 80+ receiving yardsKalshi57% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Ja'Marr Chase: 130+ receiving yardsKalshi82% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Ja'Marr Chase: 70+ receiving yardsKalshi61% Ja'Marr Chase: 70+Open
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Ja'Marr Chase: 150+ receiving yardsKalshi90% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Ja'Marr Chase: 140+ receiving yardsKalshi87% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Chase Brown: 15+ receiving yardsKalshi62% Chase Brown: 15+Open
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Brenton Strange: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi70% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Bhayshul Tuten: 15+ receiving yardsKalshi59% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Parker Washington: 90+ receiving yardsKalshi63% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Brian Thomas Jr.: 70+ receiving yardsKalshi88% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Brian Thomas Jr.: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi77% NoOpen
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Parker Washington: 60+ receiving yardsKalshi63% Parker Washington: 60+Open
Jacksonville vs Cincinnati: Receiving Yards: Parker Washington: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi74% Parker Washington: 50+Open

Venue activity

Holders—
Held value—
Trades (24h)—
Trades—
Open interest—
Comments0

Discussion on Predxy

Sign in to join the discussion.

Nobody has said anything here yet.

As of Oct 1, 10:52 PM UTC