PolymarketDelisted

Game Spread: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida (-4.5) vs Paulo Dos Santos (+4.5)

Paulo Dos Santos50%
Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida50%

Price has not been independently checked yet.

Trade
Set your country to see where you can trade.Set your country →
Opens the venue in a new tab, through Predxy.
24h volume—
7d volume—
30d volume—
Liquidity—
Spread100%
ResolvesOct 6, 2026in 6 days

Probability history

Drag to move · pinch or ⌘/Ctrl+scroll to zoom

Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.

Probability history0%25%50%75%100%Sep 29, 05:50 AMSep 29, 11:33 AMSep 29, 05:16 PMSep 29, 11:00 PMShaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.

No recorded data before Sep 29 in this window.

Based on this market’s outcome prices, expressed as probabilities.

Resolution rules

This market will resolve to "Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida" if Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida wins 4.5 or more total games than Paulo Dos Santos in the upcoming tennis match, scheduled for September 29, 2026 at 10:30AM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "Paulo Dos Santos". Games won will be counted across all sets played in the match. A set decided by a tiebreak will count as one game for the winner of that tiebreak, and a match tiebreak played in place of a final set will also count as one game for its winner. If the match is canceled (not played at all), or is delayed beyond 14 days from the scheduled date without completion at 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed due to retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve 50-50, unless the outcome of this market has already been unconditionally determined by the completed portion of play under the match format published by the tournament organizer for that round. For example, if the match ends at a point where Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida could no longer have finished 4.5 or more games ahead even by winning every remaining game, this market will resolve to "Paulo Dos Santos". If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Sourcehttps://www.atptour.com/en/scores/current

Other legs of this event

MarketVenuePriceStatus
Almeida vs. Santos: Match O/U 22.5Polymarket91% OverOpen
Set 2 Winner: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Paulo Dos SantosPolymarket91% Matheus Pucinelli de AlmeidaOpen
Set 1 Winner: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Paulo Dos SantosPolymarket100% Paulo Dos SantosOpen
Almeida vs. Santos: Set 2 Games O/U 8.5Polymarket50% UnderOpen
Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs. Paulo Dos Santos: Total Sets O/U 2.5Polymarket91% Over 2.5Open
Set Handicap: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida (-1.5) vs Paulo Dos Santos (+1.5)Polymarket91% Paulo Dos SantosOpen
Almeida vs. Santos: Match O/U 21.5Polymarket91% OverOpen
Almeida vs. Santos: Match O/U 23.5Polymarket91% OverOpen
Almeida vs. Santos: Set 2 Games O/U 9.5Polymarket91% UnderOpen
Almeida vs. Santos: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5Polymarket91% OverOpen
Almeida vs. Santos: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5Polymarket100% UnderOpen
Almeida vs. Santos: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5Polymarket100% UnderOpen
Almeida vs. Santos: Set 2 Games O/U 10.5Polymarket91% UnderOpen
Set Handicap: Paulo Dos Santos (-1.5) vs Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida (+1.5)Polymarket91% Matheus Pucinelli de AlmeidaOpen
Curitiba: Completed Match: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Paulo Dos SantosPolymarket50% YesOpen
Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Paulo Dos Santos: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida winsPolymarket98% Matheus Pucinelli de AlmeidaOpen

Venue activity

Holders—
Held value—
Trades (24h)—
Trades—
Open interest—
Comments0

Discussion on Predxy

Sign in to join the discussion.

Nobody has said anything here yet.

As of Sep 30, 03:34 AM UTC