PolymarketResolved

Parks vs. Fernandez: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5

Over100%
Under0%

Price has not been independently checked yet.

This market has settled. The prices shown are final.
Trade
Set your country to see where you can trade.Set your country →
Opens the venue in a new tab, through Predxy.
24h volume—
7d volume—
30d volume—
Liquidity$0
Spread0%
ResolvesSep 30, 20262 days ago

Probability history

Drag to move · pinch or ⌘/Ctrl+scroll to zoom

Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.

Probability history0%25%50%75%100%Sep 22, 02:24 PMSep 23, 11:13 AMSep 24, 08:02 AMSep 25, 04:51 AMShaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.

Based on this market’s outcome prices, expressed as probabilities.

Resolution rules

This market refers to the tennis match between Alycia Parks and Leylah Fernandez in the Singapore Open, originally scheduled for September 22, 2026 at 10:00PM ET. This market will resolve to "Over" if the total number of games completed in the first set equals or exceeds 10. Otherwise, it will resolve to "Under." Any first-set tiebreak counts as one (1) game. If the match is postponed or suspended, this market will remain open until the first set has been completed. A postponement alone will not trigger a 50-50 resolution. If the match is permanently abandoned before the first set is completed, or if the first set has not been completed by October 6, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve 50-50, unless the outcome has already been unconditionally determined based on completed play. An outcome is considered unconditionally determined if it would have been guaranteed under every possible completion of the set played according to the match format published by the tournament organizer for that round, including whether the set is decided by a tiebreak. For example, for a line of 9.5, if play stops with the first set at 5-4, completing the set would have required at least 1 additional game, resulting in at least 10 games played, so "Over" would resolve as the winning outcome. The primary resolution source for this market will be official WTA statistics; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Sourcehttps://www.wtatennis.com/scores

Other legs of this event

MarketVenuePriceStatus
Singapore Open: Alycia Parks vs Leylah FernandezPolymarket100% Leylah FernandezOpen
Singapore Open: Completed Match: Alycia Parks vs Leylah FernandezPolymarket100% YesOpen
Set 1 Winner: Alycia Parks vs Leylah FernandezPolymarket100% Leylah FernandezOpen
Set 2 Winner: Alycia Parks vs Leylah FernandezPolymarket100% Leylah FernandezOpen
Alycia Parks vs. Leylah Fernandez: Total Sets O/U 2.5Polymarket100% Under 2.5Open
Parks vs. Fernandez: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5Polymarket100% OverOpen
Parks vs. Fernandez: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5Polymarket100% UnderOpen
Parks vs. Fernandez: Set 2 Games O/U 8.5Polymarket100% OverOpen
Parks vs. Fernandez: Set 2 Games O/U 9.5Polymarket100% UnderOpen
Parks vs. Fernandez: Set 2 Games O/U 10.5Polymarket100% UnderOpen
Parks vs. Fernandez: Match O/U 21.5Polymarket100% UnderOpen
Parks vs. Fernandez: Match O/U 22.5Polymarket100% UnderOpen
Parks vs. Fernandez: Match O/U 23.5Polymarket100% UnderOpen
Set Handicap: Leylah Fernandez (-1.5) vs Alycia Parks (+1.5)Polymarket100% Leylah FernandezOpen
Game Spread: Leylah Fernandez (-4.5) vs Alycia Parks (+4.5)Polymarket100% Leylah FernandezOpen

Venue activity

Holders—
Held value—
Trades (24h)—
Trades—
Open interest—
Comments0

Discussion on Predxy

Sign in to join the discussion.

Nobody has said anything here yet.

As of Oct 2, 12:35 PM UTC