KalshiOpen

Will SCOTUS allow Arizona’s citizenship-proof and pre-election noncitizen-removal rules?: Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Republican National Committee in Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota Before Aug 1, 2028

Before Aug 1, 202869%
No31%

Price checked at

Trade
Set your country to see where you can trade.Set your country →
Opens the venue in a new tab, through Predxy.
24h volume$0
7d volume—
30d volume—
Liquidity—
Spread10%
ResolvesAug 1, 2028in 2 years

Probability history

Drag to move · pinch or ⌘/Ctrl+scroll to zoom

Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.

Probability history0%25%50%75%100%Sep 7Sep 13Sep 19Sep 25Oct 1Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.

Based on this market’s outcome prices, expressed as probabilities.

Resolution rules

If the Supreme Court, in Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota, rules neither the National Voter Registration Act nor a federal consent decree bars Arizona from requiring satisfactory evidence of U.S. citizenship on its state voter-registration form, and that the Act does not bar Arizona from canceling noncitizens’ registrations within 90 days of a federal election, then the market resolves to Yes. The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that neither the National Voter Registration Act nor a federal consent decree prohibits Arizona from requiring voter-registration applicants using a state registration form to produce satisfactory evidence of U.S. citizenship, and that the National Voter Registration Act does not prohibit Arizona from implementing a program within 90 days of a federal election to cancel the registrations of voters who are not U.S. citizens, after Issuance and before August 1, 2028. The market resolves to Yes only if the Court answers both questions in that manner; a split ruling, dismissal, DIG, or remand without a merits ruling satisfying both conditions resolves to No.

Venue activity

Holders—
Held value—
Trades (24h)—
Trades—
Open interest—
Comments0

Discussion on Predxy

Sign in to join the discussion.

Nobody has said anything here yet.

As of Oct 1, 03:11 PM UTC