Will SCOTUS let district courts hear constitutional challenges to veterans-benefits laws?: Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Floyd D. Johnson in Johnson v. United States Congress Before Aug 1, 2028
Price checked at
Probability history
Market-implied probabilities · All recorded historyDrag to move · pinch or ⌘/Ctrl+scroll to zoom
Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.
Based on this market’s outcome prices, expressed as probabilities.
Resolution rules
If the Supreme Court, in Johnson v. United States Congress, rules the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act did not strip district courts of jurisdiction to hear constitutional challenges to acts of Congress affecting veterans’ benefits, then the market resolves to Yes. The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act did not strip federal district courts of the jurisdiction recognized in Johnson v. Robison to hear challenges to the constitutionality of acts of Congress affecting veterans’ benefits, after Issuance and before August 1, 2028. The market resolves to No if the Court rules that the Act stripped district courts of that jurisdiction. If the case is dismissed, settled, found to have been improvidently granted, or remanded or otherwise disposed of without a merits ruling resolving that jurisdictional question, the market resolves to No.
Venue activity
Read from the venue this minuteDiscussion on Predxy
What Predxy's readers make of this market. Everyone can read; signed-in readers can write. The venue's own thread, when it has one, is the box below.Sign in to join the discussion.
Nobody has said anything here yet.
As of Sep 30, 03:11 PM UTC