SCOTUS accepts sports event contract case by October 31, 2026?
Price checked at
Probability history
Market-implied probabilities · All recorded historyDrag to move · pinch or ⌘/Ctrl+scroll to zoom
Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.
Based on this market’s outcome prices, expressed as probabilities.
Resolution rules
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the Supreme Court of the United States grants certiorari in a case explicitly concerning the legality, regulation, or jurisdictional authority over sports event contracts by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No." A case qualifies if it addresses at least one of the following: (1) whether contracts based on sporting event outcomes constitute regulated derivatives under the Commodity Exchange Act; (2) whether federal regulation via the Commodity Futures Trading Commission preempts state-level gambling laws as applied to such contracts; or (3) whether sports event contracts offered by federally licensed markets may legally be offered, restricted, or prohibited by federal or state authorities. The certiorari grant must be publicly confirmed via the official SCOTUS docket or orders list, and verifiable through credible legal reporting or the Supreme Court’s official website. The case does not need to be heard, scheduled, or decided to qualify. The resolution source will be a consensus census of credible reporting.
The same question elsewhere
2 venues carry it- Polymarketthis market
SCOTUS accepts sports event contract case by October 31, 2026?
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the Supreme Court of the United States grants certiorari in a case explicitly concerning the legality, regulation, or jurisdictional authority over sports event contracts by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No." A case qualifies if it addresses at least one of the following: (1) whether contracts based on sporting event outcomes constitute regulated derivatives under the Commodity Exchange Act; (2) whether federal regulation via the Commodity Futures Trading Commission preempts state-level gambling laws as applied to such contracts; or (3) whether sports event contracts offered by federally licensed markets may legally be offered, restricted, or prohibited by federal or state authorities. The certiorari grant must be publicly confirmed via the official SCOTUS docket or orders list, and verifiable through credible legal reporting or the Supreme Court’s official website. The case does not need to be heard, scheduled, or decided to qualify. The resolution source will be a consensus census of credible reporting.
26 holders · 6 comments · read Sep 27, 07:47 PM UTC
- PredictFunOpen →
SCOTUS accepts sports event contract case by October 31, 2026?
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the Supreme Court of the United States grants certiorari in a case explicitly concerning the legality, regulation, or jurisdictional authority over sports event contracts by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No." A case qualifies if it addresses at least one of the following: (1) whether contracts based on sporting event outcomes constitute regulated derivatives under the Commodity Exchange Act; (2) whether federal regulation via the Commodity Futures Trading Commission preempts state-level gambling laws as applied to such contracts; or (3) whether sports event contracts offered by federally licensed markets may legally be offered, restricted, or prohibited by federal or state authorities. The certiorari grant must be publicly confirmed via the official SCOTUS docket or orders list, and verifiable through credible legal reporting or the Supreme Court’s official website. The case does not need to be heard, scheduled, or decided to qualify. The resolution source will be a consensus census of credible reporting.
read Sep 30, 08:16 AM UTC
Other legs of this event
A leg read alone is misleading; the others are beside it.| Market | Venue | Price | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCOTUS accepts sports event contract case by December 31, 2026? | Polymarket | 62% No | Open |
Venue activity
Read from the venue 3 days agoTop holders
- ZinfandelEnjoyer13692932272361189021112045966661445113447519742748143136300009105140669578440
- Rebecca-9568107307697656419495123517225618217442021821360907039345921228709122627149227
- KurtOziz13692932272361189021112045966661445113447519742748143136300009105140669578440
- bernardbulletin68107307697656419495123517225618217442021821360907039345921228709122627149227
- ScottyNooo68107307697656419495123517225618217442021821360907039345921228709122627149227
A snapshot of positions, not a track record.
Recent trades
- BUY90%$119.34 days ago
- SELL10%$125 days ago
- BUY7%$2.15 days ago
- BUY95%$47.55 days ago
- SELL6%$0.36 days ago
- BUY96%$147.410 days ago
Discussion on Predxy
What Predxy's readers make of this market. Everyone can read; signed-in readers can write. The venue's own thread, when it has one, is the box below.Sign in to join the discussion.
Nobody has said anything here yet.
4 comments
From Polymarket's own thread- Edward-Craven · 8 months ago
Given sentiment on twitter - good shot they take this case
- FitzGeralb · 9 months ago
Slow your roll. The Supreme Court is conservative, but they also love the 10th Amendment.
- Priestleu · 10 months ago
They gotta fix the mess the lower courts made about whether a sports bet is a "swap." That's classic SCOTUS material.
- Gifted-Tomato · 12 months ago
Even if they get geofenced in MA Ka*shi won’t be in a major rush to appeal because the legal ambiguity is scaring the regulated operators away
As of Sep 30, 07:33 PM UTC