PolymarketOpen

U.S. x Russia Nuclear deal by September 30?

No100%
Yes0%

Price checked at

Trade
Set your country to see where you can trade.Set your country →
Opens the venue in a new tab, through Predxy.
24h volume$93.3
7d volume$687.4
30d volume$1.1K
Liquidity$10.9K
Spread0%
ResolvesOct 1, 2026tomorrow

Probability history

Drag to move · pinch or ⌘/Ctrl+scroll to zoom

Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.

Probability history0%25%50%75%100%Sep 2Sep 9Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.Shaded periods have no successful hourly price check.

Based on this market’s outcome prices, expressed as probabilities.

Resolution rules

This market will resolve to "Yes" if an official agreement on nuclear arms control or strategic nuclear weapons limitation is reached between the United States and the Russian Federation between market creation and September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. Only agreements that are publicly announced and acknowledged by both the U.S. and Russia will qualify. The agreement must pertain to nuclear arms control or limitation—such as a treaty, framework, or memorandum—addressing matters including (but not limited to) nuclear warheads, delivery systems, verification mechanisms, or strategic stability. An extension, amendment, or replacement of the New START treaty will qualify, provided it is publicly announced as a concluded agreement by both parties within the time frame. Exploratory discussions or stated intent to extend without a finalized agreement will not qualify. Agreements that include both the United States and Russia as named parties—whether bilateral or as part of a broader multilateral framework—will qualify, provided the agreement directly addresses nuclear arms control. The agreement does not need to be ratified or implemented for this market to resolve "Yes"; a formal announcement of a concluded agreement is sufficient. The primary resolution source for this market will be official statements from the U.S. government (e.g., the White House, State Department) and/or the Russian Federation (e.g., the Kremlin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs). However, a clear and overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming that such an agreement has been reached will also qualify.

Other legs of this event

MarketVenuePriceStatus
U.S. x Russia Nuclear deal by December 31, 2026?Polymarket95% NoOpen

Venue activity

Holders24
Held value—
Trades (24h)—
Trades—
Open interest—
Comments35

Best bid 1% · best ask 2%

Top holders

  • LornaPredicts98759146763395859230536380977268952103155345229784627636280176372439650750984
  • Anguished-Skyline23342673884768237799344370193751413062965552895385543900478540140149633368281
  • b41eAd279375742D6C2A1A2239Bdce56376411fD.23342673884768237799344370193751413062965552895385543900478540140149633368281
  • BoberKurwaYaPerdole98759146763395859230536380977268952103155345229784627636280176372439650750984
  • IlyaJoePeach98759146763395859230536380977268952103155345229784627636280176372439650750984

A snapshot of positions, not a track record.

Recent trades

  • SELL98%$4.96 days ago
  • BUY99%$56 days ago
  • SELL98%$07 days ago
  • SELL97%$53.77 days ago
  • BUY99%$54.47 days ago
  • SELL98%$54.87 days ago

Discussion on Predxy

Sign in to join the discussion.

Nobody has said anything here yet.

35 comments

Comments belong to the venue's event, not to this outcome. Every leg of the same event shares this thread.
  • Eia · 8 months ago

    I see, nice profit there. Whats your Yes target price for re-entry? Looking forward to the future fill

  • Porx · 8 months ago

    I sold at the highest point because liquidity would still come here.

  • Eia · 8 months ago

    With that level of conviction one would think you should own some yes shares before calling out the other side? Please fill some more of my no position. But you are ignoring the fact that the treaty has been dead since the Rus/Ukr war and that the US has no benefit of signing it. No less, since the orange buffoon took office the world order has drastically changed, to the point where "last 50 years" is irrelevant.

  • Glodisdal · 8 months ago

    Rubio: I don't have any announcement on New START. Obviously, the President's been clear in the past that in order to have true arms control in the 21st century, it's impossible to do something that doesn't include China because of their vast and rapidly growing stockpile. no china = no deal …

  • Glodisdal · 8 months ago

    Why should the "no" side be "very wrong"? Until a few weeks ago, you claimed that the treaty would be extended, and you were completely wrong. The article even says that no agreement could be reached. Perhaps you should listen again to Trump's past interviews, in which he always said that an extension would only be possible with the inclusion of China.

  • Porx · 8 months ago

    START treaties have been extended or re-signed for 50 years; this time, stupid Trump simply dragged things out for a few weeks or months. Those who bought "no" at such a high price were very wrong.

  • Porx · 8 months ago

    The US and Russia are negotiating an extension of the New START agreement - AXIOS

  • Eia · 8 months ago

    Guess you are right, but would've been better if you sold 😅

  • DM7622 · 8 months ago

    its a no by feb 4

  • Porx · 9 months ago

    I never lie, Trump actually said he wants to make a new deal, what's the problem?

  • Eia · 9 months ago

    Dont ruin his game. Porx always buys yes, comes with an undocumented claim, and then sells out. So trade against it instead.

  • Glodisdal · 9 months ago

    The comment below is complete bullshit. Trump said he would let the treaty expire. Quote: "When it expires, it expires."

  • Porx · 9 months ago

    Donald Trump has announced his readiness to conclude a new nuclear arms control treaty with Russia.

  • AnonSequitur · 10 months ago

    This is the shittiest market ever

  • BigBoot · 10 months ago

    Trump's new peace plan's 17th point references continuation of the New START Treaty that would count for resolution of this market. Since the market for ceasefire in Ukraine this year is at 15%, it seems that this market is severely underrated

  • Svitovid · 11 months ago

    We dont want nukes in golden age!

  • Svitovid · 11 months ago

    N word?

  • wbxxx · 12 months ago

    Highly undervalued

  • anonymous · 12 months ago

    When will this meeting be?

  • Porx · 12 months ago

    Putin is very insistent on pushing this through to Trump and will definitely propose announcing the extension of the New START Treaty following the Budapest meeting.

As of Sep 30, 02:47 AM UTC