KalshiAbierto

New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 15+ receiving yards

Rome Odunze: 15+76 %
No25 %

Precio comprobado el

Operar
Define tu país para ver dónde puedes operar.Definir tu país →
Abre la plataforma en una pestaña nueva, a través de Predxy.
Volumen 24 h0 US$
Volumen 7 d—
Volumen 30 d—
Liquidez—
Spread5 %
Se resuelve4 oct 2026pasado mañana

Historial de probabilidades

Arrastra para mover · pellizca o usa ⌘/Ctrl+desplazamiento para ampliar

Historial de probabilidades0%25%50%75%100%1 oct, 05:261 oct, 16:182 oct, 03:102 oct, 14:03

Basado en los precios de los posibles resultados de este mercado, expresados como probabilidades.

Reglas de resolución

If Rome Odunze records 15+ receiving yards in the New York J vs Chicago Pro Football game originally scheduled for Oct 4, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. The following market refers to Rome Odunze in the New York J vs Chicago Pro Football game originally scheduled for Oct 4, 2026. If Rome Odunze is active but never takes a snap, the market settles to the fair market price before game start. Once Rome Odunze takes at least one snap, even if nullified by penalty, the market settles based on receiving yards recorded. Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.

Otras variantes de este evento

MercadoPlataformaPrecioEstado
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Braelon Allen: 15+ receiving yardsKalshi59 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Isaiah Williams: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi82 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi58 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Kalif Raymond: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi60 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Garrett Wilson: 80+ receiving yardsKalshi54 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Colston Loveland: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi71 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 60+ receiving yardsKalshi81 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Luther Burden III: 100+ receiving yardsKalshi89 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: D'Andre Swift: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi84 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: D'Andre Swift: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi71 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 70+ receiving yardsKalshi87 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Cole Kmet: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi80 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Luther Burden III: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi52 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Isaiah Davis: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi80 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Colston Loveland: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi58 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Luther Burden III: 80+ receiving yardsKalshi82 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Garrett Wilson: 90+ receiving yardsKalshi61 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Garrett Wilson: 100+ receiving yardsKalshi69 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Isaiah Davis: 10+ receiving yardsKalshi51 % Isaiah Davis: 10+Abierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Garrett Wilson: 130+ receiving yardsKalshi91 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi76 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Colston Loveland: 70+ receiving yardsKalshi91 % NoAbierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Garrett Wilson: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi75 % Garrett Wilson: 50+Abierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi61 % Rome Odunze: 25+Abierto
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Braelon Allen: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi80 % NoAbierto

Actividad en la plataforma

Titulares—
Valor en posiciones—
Operaciones (24 h)—
Operaciones—
Interés abierto—
Comentarios0

Debate en Predxy

Inicia sesión para participar en el debate.

Nadie ha dicho nada aquí todavía.

A las 2 oct, 14:29 UTC