KalshiDeschisă

New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Luther Burden III: 80+ receiving yards

No82 %
Luther Burden III: 80+18 %

Preț verificat la

Tranzacționează
Setează-ți țara ca să vezi unde poți tranzacționa.Setează-ți țara →
Deschide platforma într-o filă nouă, prin Predxy.
Volum 24h10,1 USD
Volum 7z—
Volum 30z—
Lichiditate—
Spread14 %
Se decide4 oct. 2026poimâine

Istoricul probabilităților

Trage pentru a muta · ciupește sau ⌘/Ctrl+derulare pentru zoom

Istoricul probabilităților0%25%50%75%100%1 oct., 05:261 oct., 16:352 oct., 03:442 oct., 14:53

Pe baza prețurilor rezultatelor posibile ale acestei piețe, exprimate ca probabilități.

Reguli de decizie

If Luther Burden III records 80+ receiving yards in the New York J vs Chicago Pro Football game originally scheduled for Oct 4, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. The following market refers to Luther Burden III in the New York J vs Chicago Pro Football game originally scheduled for Oct 4, 2026. If Luther Burden III is active but never takes a snap, the market settles to the fair market price before game start. Once Luther Burden III takes at least one snap, even if nullified by penalty, the market settles based on receiving yards recorded. Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.

Celelalte variante ale acestui eveniment

PiațăPlatformăPrețStare
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Braelon Allen: 15+ receiving yardsKalshi59 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Isaiah Williams: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi82 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi58 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Kalif Raymond: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi60 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Garrett Wilson: 80+ receiving yardsKalshi54 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Colston Loveland: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi71 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 60+ receiving yardsKalshi81 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Luther Burden III: 100+ receiving yardsKalshi89 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: D'Andre Swift: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi84 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: D'Andre Swift: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi71 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 70+ receiving yardsKalshi87 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Cole Kmet: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi80 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Luther Burden III: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi52 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Isaiah Davis: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi80 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Colston Loveland: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi62 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Garrett Wilson: 90+ receiving yardsKalshi61 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Garrett Wilson: 100+ receiving yardsKalshi69 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Isaiah Davis: 10+ receiving yardsKalshi51 % Isaiah Davis: 10+Deschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Garrett Wilson: 130+ receiving yardsKalshi91 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi76 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Colston Loveland: 70+ receiving yardsKalshi91 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Garrett Wilson: 50+ receiving yardsKalshi77 % Garrett Wilson: 50+Deschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Rome Odunze: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi61 % Rome Odunze: 25+Deschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Braelon Allen: 40+ receiving yardsKalshi93 % NoDeschisă
New York J vs Chicago: Receiving Yards: Braelon Allen: 25+ receiving yardsKalshi84 % NoDeschisă

Activitatea platformei

Deținători—
Valoare deținută—
Tranzacții (24h)—
Tranzacții—
Poziții deschise—
Comentarii0

Discuție pe Predxy

Autentifică-te ca să participi la discuție.

Nimeni nu a spus încă nimic aici.

La 2 oct., 15:16 UTC