Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?
Preis geprüft am
Wahrscheinlichkeitsverlauf
Marktimplizierte Wahrscheinlichkeiten · Gesamter aufgezeichneter VerlaufZiehen zum Verschieben · Zwei-Finger-Geste oder ⌘/Strg+Scrollen zum Zoomen
Schattierte Zeiträume haben keine erfolgreiche stündliche Preisprüfung.
Basierend auf den Preisen der möglichen Ergebnisse dieses Marktes, ausgedrückt als Wahrscheinlichkeiten.
Entscheidungsregeln
A one-time wealth tax on billionaires has been proposed to potentially appear on California's ballot for the November 3, 2026 general election. You can read more about that here: https://6abc.com/post/california-union-proposes-taxing-billionaires-offset-medicaid-cuts-low-income-people/18066430/ This market will resolve to "Yes" if any proposition containing a one-time tax targeting individuals, households, or family units with wealth, assets, or net worth of at least $1 billion (USD or equivalent) passes in the named election. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If no qualifying ballot initiative is certified to appear on the official statewide California ballot as a proposition to be voted on in the stated election by June 25, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (the official cutoff date for new initiatives to be approved), or if all qualifying propositions/initiatives are removed from the ballot or amended before the election such that the main threshold drops below $1 billion, this market will resolve "No". The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Government of the State of California, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Dieselbe Frage anderswo
2 Plattformen führen sie- Polymarketdieser Markt
Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?
A one-time wealth tax on billionaires has been proposed to potentially appear on California's ballot for the November 3, 2026 general election. You can read more about that here: https://6abc.com/post/california-union-proposes-taxing-billionaires-offset-medicaid-cuts-low-income-people/18066430/ This market will resolve to "Yes" if any proposition containing a one-time tax targeting individuals, households, or family units with wealth, assets, or net worth of at least $1 billion (USD or equivalent) passes in the named election. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If no qualifying ballot initiative is certified to appear on the official statewide California ballot as a proposition to be voted on in the stated election by June 25, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (the official cutoff date for new initiatives to be approved), or if all qualifying propositions/initiatives are removed from the ballot or amended before the election such that the main threshold drops below $1 billion, this market will resolve "No". The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Government of the State of California, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
875 Halter · 28 Kommentare · gelesen 25. Sept., 21:16 UTC
- PredictFunÖffnen →
Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?
A one-time wealth tax on billionaires has been proposed to potentially appear on California's ballot for the November 3, 2026 general election. You can read more about that here: https://6abc.com/post/california-union-proposes-taxing-billionaires-offset-medicaid-cuts-low-income-people/18066430/ This market will resolve to "Yes" if any proposition containing a one-time tax targeting individuals, households, or family units with wealth, assets, or net worth of at least $1 billion (USD or equivalent) passes in the named election. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If no qualifying ballot initiative is certified to appear on the official statewide California ballot as a proposition to be voted on in the stated election by June 25, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (the official cutoff date for new initiatives to be approved), or if all qualifying propositions/initiatives are removed from the ballot or amended before the election such that the main threshold drops below $1 billion, this market will resolve "No". The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Government of the State of California, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
gelesen 30. Sept., 01:11 UTC
Aktivität auf der Plattform
Von der Plattform gelesen vor 4 TagenBestes Gebot 32 % · bester Brief 33 %
Größte Halter
- forcestrut138487155026041533062980821872238023790862908049855818921747904019478875496931
- drop12638487155026041533062980821872238023790862908049855818921747904019478875496931
- chungguskhan7330556727383706468662351173040823924339817877848787483691015397124505109410
- wan1237330556727383706468662351173040823924339817877848787483691015397124505109410
- truefish3138487155026041533062980821872238023790862908049855818921747904019478875496931
Eine Momentaufnahme der Positionen, keine Erfolgsbilanz.
Letzte Trades
- BUY68 %76,9 $vor 5 Tagen
- SELL67 %1,9 $vor 5 Tagen
- SELL67 %33,5 $vor 5 Tagen
- BUY68 %54,4 $vor 5 Tagen
- SELL33 %1,7 $vor 5 Tagen
- BUY68 %10,5 $vor 5 Tagen
Diskussion auf Predxy
Was Predxys Leser von diesem Markt halten. Lesen kann jeder; schreiben, wer angemeldet ist. Die Diskussion der Plattform selbst, sofern es eine gibt, steht im Kasten darunter.Melde dich an, um mitzudiskutieren.
Hier hat noch niemand etwas gesagt.
29 Kommentare
Aus dem eigenen Thread von Polymarket- bernardbulletin · vor 13 Tagen
Tax billionaires out of existence
- betpro3 · vor 30 Tagen
This is not what this market is about though
- Geolibertarian · vor 2 Monaten
This is underpriced. Never underestimate the stupidity of the average voter.
- Envious-Concern · vor 2 Monaten
Interesting point, the voters will decide and I think we know which way they will lean!
- AliKhamenei · vor 3 Monaten
difference is that the democratic party leaders like Gavin Newsome opposes the billionaire tax, but I doubt he will support the poison pill bill
- polymark · vor 3 Monaten
Could this increase the odds for this market? If im reading the rules of the market correctly, it could resolve Yes because the measure passes during the election but the wealth tax could still not take effect if either of the poison pill initiatives pass. Meaning, those opposing it could direct resources into the making sure the other initiatives pass instead.
- polymark · vor 3 Monaten
Seems as if those opposed to it believe there's a serious chance it could pass: "Two efforts that were crafted to sink the proposed billionaire tax — dubbed poison pills — also qualified for the Nov. 3 ballot, according to the California Secretary of State’s office. One would bar new state taxes on personal property, while the other prohibits any new taxes being exempted from existing state spending rules and to be regularly audited. If the billionaire tax proposal is approved by voters but either of the other proposals receives more votes, the tax measure would be voided."
- polymark · vor 3 Monaten
Sure, but there's been plenty of measures & candidates that won that were not the most well funded. The 'poison pill' initiatives indicate, along with the revealed preferences of certain wealthy people (e.g. Sergey Brin moving out of the state), that there's a serious possibility the wealthy believe it could pass. Newsom & other establishment Dems opposing it does hurt it tho
- AliKhamenei · vor 3 Monaten
support drops drastically for any ballot measure as the election gets closer. Billionaires are going to be dumping millions into ad campaigns
- AliKhamenei · vor 3 Monaten
Can we have a 100% Wealth Tax for Gavin Newsome please?
- polymark · vor 4 Monaten
Polling consistently has 50 to 60% support. Can anyone steelman the case for why they think it won't pass? I get the sense that, given ballot measures aren't compulsory to vote on, there's a much larger number of people who are passionately in favor of this vs the number that are against it. (From the Wikipedia page for Polling data)
- iutwpfal · vor 5 Monaten
Yes but no but irrelevant
- kkss198x · vor 5 Monaten
the fixed assets—factories and infrastructure—remain. As long as engineers and skilled labor stay, production can be restarted. While libertarian theory emphasizes non-aggression.
- mever · vor 5 Monaten
If the rich all leave, will the poor still have job opportunities?
- Massive-Neon · vor 6 Monaten
- thechainsmokers · vor 7 Monaten
2 million dollar volume is not gonna cover a billion dollars buddy
- adonpoli · vor 8 Monaten
another pump ?
- Eia · vor 8 Monaten
Since poly is used as "polling" info in news media, trying to influence the polybet to influence the real world vote? Surprising its on the opposite side of the billionaires..
- Eia · vor 8 Monaten
Whats up with these three new accounts hoarding all the yes?
- nick-turani · vor 9 Monaten
this will violate both the california state constitution and the united states constitution: 14th amendment due process, retroactivity, right to travel, armstrong vs US, then 5th amendment takings, forced liquidation. this is free money, no chance this can proceed from both state and federal levels
Stand 30. Sept., 05:11 UTC